Plaintiff firms vs. AmLaw 100
File Logic vs. Harvey
Harvey is built for the AmLaw 100. File Logic is built for the firms you actually compete with.
Where Harvey stands today.
Harvey is an AI platform for BigLaw firms and corporate legal teams, covering research, drafting, document analysis, and agentic workflows.
Harvey is a strong AI platform for BigLaw and large corporate legal departments. The product is impressive, the security posture is enterprise-grade, and the customer list is real. The match with a plaintiff firm — particularly one focused on SSD, VA, PI, or Workers' Comp — is narrower. File Logic is built for the workflow and economics of plaintiff practice.
File Logic vs. Harvey, attribute by attribute.
No checkmark spam. Real product attributes — pricing posture, onboarding, citations, scan handling, practice-area depth — so you can make an honest decision.
- Target buyerPlaintiff firms (SSD, VA, PI, WC)AmLaw 100, in-house teams
- Pricing postureTransparent, per-firm planBigLaw enterprise
- Practice areas with tailored outputSSD, VA, PI, Workers' CompGeneral-purpose Assistant + Vault
- Medical record specializationCited medical chronologies in minutesNot the primary use case
- Free trial14-day free trial, no cardEnterprise sales process
- Citations on every answerPage-level citation on every answerCitations in outputs
- OnboardingDay one — drag, drop, reviewEnterprise implementation
- HIPAA-ready, BAAHIPAA-ready, BAA availableEnterprise security; HIPAA varies
- Best forPlaintiff record-heavy workBigLaw multi-practice firms
Comparison reflects public product information at time of writing. Competitor product capabilities may have changed; if anything is out of date, let us know.
Where File Logic wins.
Right buyer, right product
Built for plaintiff practice, not BigLaw.
Harvey is impressive technology aimed at a different market. Plaintiff firms doing SSD, VA, PI, and Workers' Comp share almost none of BigLaw's workflows. File Logic is built around plaintiff economics: cases driven by medical evidence, paralegals and attorneys in the same workflow, and pricing a managing partner can sign off on without a procurement department.
- Practice-area-specific output for SSD, VA, PI, and WC
- Designed for plaintiff team structures — paralegals and attorneys
- Per-firm pricing without enterprise procurement
Specialist depth
The medical-records workflow, end to end.
A general-purpose Assistant + Vault can analyze documents, but it does not know that an ALJ is going to look at RFC limitations, or that a VA nexus case turns on connecting C-file documents in a specific way. File Logic does. Every part of the product is shaped around the records-to-work-product flow.
- Cited chronologies in minutes, not after a vault setup
- Surfaces the specific evidence each plaintiff case type turns on
- Templates and prompts your team saves and reuses across cases
Self-serve
No enterprise sale to evaluate the product.
Evaluating Harvey means talking to sales. Evaluating File Logic means uploading a record. A 14-day free trial, no credit card, and a transparent per-firm plan means you can decide whether this is right for your firm without a procurement cycle.
- 14-day free trial, no credit card
- Transparent per-firm pricing
- Day-one productivity — no integration project
When Harvey may be the better pick.
If your firm is large, multi-practice, and looking for a single AI platform that spans research, drafting, document review, and agentic workflows across many case types — and you have the budget and procurement process to match — Harvey is built for that buyer.
- You are an AmLaw 200 or large multi-practice firm
- Your needs span corporate, litigation, and regulatory work
- You have the budget and procurement process for enterprise AI
Common questions about switching from Harvey.
See File Logic on your own records.
No credit card. No sales call required to evaluate.